Currently viewing the tag: "masturbation"

Los Angeles chiropractor - sensual pleasuresBrahmacharya is non-sensuality, a yama (code of conduct) that warns against attaching to sensual pleasure, be it drugs, food, or even extreme risk-taking (e.g., speeding on the freeway). However, brahmacharya is most often discussed in the context of sexual pleasure. As a requirement for reproduction and fueled by the cyclical or spontaneous release of hormones, sexual release is a universal animal trait, predating the species by a billion years. As both a primary instinct and a source of pleasure, sex is a function on which we can easily lose our grip.

It is not that sexuality is wrong on any level, nor are food, drugs, or any other sensual pleasures, for that matter, but over-indulgence in any sensuality can lead to attachment and, ultimately, addiction, and thus a loss of our connection to the Source. In other words, when we become attached to or addicted to anything, be it a person, item, or experience, we merely emphasize our separateness. Everything we need is already within us. It is not material items or outer-directed experiences that fuel us, but instead, how they make us feel. It is why some people jump from experience to experience (or from person to person) to feel something inside themselves that they actually think is coming from the outside: power, intimacy, freedom, connection—all these things are what we feel when we do drugs, jump out of planes, or have casual sex.

But those feelings come from within—they are not outer-originating. Thus, ascribing them to outer items or experiences is one illusion that comes with a heavy cost: dissatisfaction, unfulfillment, and emotional pain. We suffer because the feelings we associate with the activity, person, or item are often short-lived and inevitably dwindle in time, increasing our sense of separation from the Source (and thus all other things in existence).

Further, all sense-indulging activities release our inner energies in a downward, or gravitating, direction. In other words, our energy condenses, gets heavy, and descends through physical and energetic channels. This is not always a bad thing, as physical manifestation or creation requires this downward movement of energy to form mass; however, when carried out in a non-creating manner or multiple times through overindulgence, it saps the energy from a person.

West Hollywood chiropractor - inner energyBrahmacharya is the practice of harnessing our inner energies so that they may be consciously directed upward toward the brain. Moving our internal energy in this way toward the brain results in shifting our consciousness toward a higher awareness, a higher reality, if you will. We can also use this harnessed energy—emanating it outward—for the unique service we provide to the world.

Dispensing one’s energy in this manner creates several valuable effects. To begin with, others benefit from the outward-directed energy. It might be in a healing capacity or an awakening, or your energy might be nurturing to others—that will depend on your natural disposition. But any number of effects can occur from this outwardly directed energy, which could potentially strengthen another’s courage, persistence, or resolve—and people will feel it—they will feel inspired in your presence. It is what makes magnetic people so attractive—an inner-directed energy flowing outward, causing those within their sphere to vibrate at certain frequencies. Brahmacharya is one clear path toward developing this type of magnetism.

Again, this is not to suggest that any sense-indulgence is bad, particularly since anything can be done in the right consciousness, but it is the attachment or addiction to that sense-indulgence that leads to convoluted consciousness and dissipated energy. So, it is not just promiscuity or casual sex that can be problematic, but also overindulgence in masturbation or pornography. All these aspects of hypersexuality lead to a chronic loss of energy and an increased sense of separateness. The more we separate from everything else in our minds, the more we become distinct, the more we operate in ego, and this is the primary cause of suffering. Separateness leads to duality, and by necessity, we must experience both sides equally: pleasure and pain, pride and humility, desire and disgust—all opposites that make up the material dimension of mind and body. Only in oneness do these distinctions dissolve, and lack of brahmacharya is one definite obstacle in realizing oneness.

Brahmacharya, along with ahimsa (non-harming), is said to make up the Royal Virtues. While ahimsa is to respect and honor others, understanding that they are no different than us—we are all manifestations of the Absolute—brahmacharya is the respect and honoring of ourselves. Truth exists in the premise that we exchange energy with whomever we have sexual contact; it is one of the most potent methods of energy exchange between people. To convolute our own internal energy, randomly or devoid of emotional intimacy, is one of the most self-devaluing things we can do, particularly when we pair it with sensory self-indulgence (drugs/alcohol). There is simply no difference between what a chronic overeater or drug addict feels and what one feels as a result of multiple empty sexual experiences. No doubt, as with any drug, the first 5, 10, 100 times feel good—sex triggers a dopamine release, after all—but do it that one time too many, and you will feel the pain that often accompanies over-indulgence in this behavior.

Coachella chiropractor - respecting othersAny experience can be brought forth in the consciousness of ahimsa and brahmacharya, even lovemaking. Lovemaking takes on a sacred, divine air when carried out from a place of intimacy, confidence, and presence. It becomes a sharing of energy, love, and appreciation. This type of interaction can induce healing, self-worth, and genuine closeness. In essence, it represents the oneness our souls so desperately crave. Sexual intimacy in the spirit of brahmacharya is as uplifting as the lack of brahmacharya is degrading.

So, practicing brahmacharya means being respectful to and honoring yourself. It is not a morality trip—please feel free to test it yourself if you disagree—it is an understanding of the universal flow and exchange of energy. It has been said that those who practice the Royal Virtues become so internally strong that their thoughts begin to materialize immediately. Think about the depth of this: when your full consciousness is directed at non-harming of yourself and others, the purity of your thoughts has the power of instantaneous manifestation. If that doesn’t inspire you, maybe nothing will. But only when you master brahmacharya can you unleash this power. It’s worth a try.


optimal orgasmic stateAs I was sitting around the virtual universe, the topic of orgasm came up, specifically how to know one’s most optimal orgasmic state, and why so many people fail to reach it, let alone know what that state might be. You better believe the right state is necessary to reach orgasm, but men and women have very different physiologies, which dictate how they get there, or whether they get there at all.

Both genders have some clear cut advantages to their sexual expressions, and some disadvantages too. For instance, orgasm in men, for the most part, is hinged on having an erection. It’s the ol’ point and shoot – they mostly come and go together. In other words, to simply be able to do it at all, a man is practically assured an orgasm. Women, on the other hand, can have sex functionally whether in the proper orgasmic state or not (albeit less gratifyingly), and many habitually do just that, over and over again – a number reporting that they enjoy sex, even without orgasm, as intimacy leads to its own rewards.

Big bangObviously the upside for men is that the pleasures of the big-bang are a part of most, if not every, sexual act. For women, though, it takes work—in the form of foreplay (although what we generally mean by this term could actually be the sex act itself)—and sometimes lots of patience. But women can and often do feel a stronger sense of intimacy with the sexual act, whereas the male sex act can, at times, be purely biological. This is likely due to some reproductive realities—like men must ejaculate to procreate, while women need only receive to conceive. By no means does this suggest that women do not love a good ol’ romp for the romp’s sake; and most certainly a big-bang orgasm is equally, if not more, sweet for a woman, but the physiological function between the sexes differs enough to cause these polarities.  All that being said, however, when it comes to anorgasmia (inability to achieve orgasm), women are exceedingly more afflicted than men.

To orgasm, a woman needs to be in the right frame, physically and mentally, as both physiological and psychological stimulation play a role in a woman’s entering the most optimal orgasmic state. Stimulating a woman’s mind is as large a part of reaching orgasm as is stimulating her body; and while not an absolute, it most certainly adds to and aids in the process. Both partners being “open,” mentally and sexually, are enormous enhancers to a woman’s orgasmability.

anorgasmiaThis is not as easy as it sounds, however: Men and women alike can have mental barriers which may not only affect our sexual performance and orgasmability, but can play a role in how we express our sexual personas (prudishly, insecurely, or overly-aggressive to name just a few), and thus dictate our sexual-life history as a whole. While these mental barriers can certainly become conscious in our awareness, most often they remain hidden away as established mores and norms, beliefs that we tuck aside, accept as reality, and despite their having little substance or validity, submit our sex lives to.  While the variety of mental barriers is large, they belong to a family of seven primary fears, which affect us on a multitude of levels, including sexually.

The Seven Primary Fears

The seven primary fears that can affect one’s sexuality to such a degree as to obstruct orgasmability are fear of moral disgrace, fear of not knowing enough or being experienced enough, fear of physical rejection, fear of social rejection, fear of inadequacy, fear of disgracing loved ones, and fear of dishonored reputation. While each can be expressed in varying forms, their foundation is rooted in the primary fear itself. I will discuss how each can act as a hidden obstacle to our sexuality, affecting performance and our ability to orgasm.

Fear of moral disgrace

Moral Disgrace - SexThe first fear is a fear of moral disgrace. This can have a number of different sources: It may be considered “sinning against God,” morally shameful, or disgraceful to one’s religious belief system or its authorities. It has its roots in a moral code that says sexual pleasure is bad, and the act of “doing it” should be for reproductive purposes only. Both men and women can have repressed feeling of guilt revolving around masturbation, past sexual experiences and particular sexual acts. I have an acquaintance, a staunch Christian, who is mortified over her penchant for anal sex. She actually believes she will be stricken down somewhere, sometime in her life for fantasizing about and indulging in what she considers to be a deviant act. Now, interestingly, she is not restricted enough by her beliefs to block her from experiencing sexual pleasure, as she reports no problems in that area, but I simply use this example to illustrate of how our beliefs color our perceptions of sex. I have no doubt that her fears affect her relationships and feelings of self-esteem and will continue to do so as long as she holds onto this irrational fear.

The idea that God is somehow for or against any sexual act is rooted in our moralistic Victorian heritage, when “irregular” sex was condemned.

In line with the physiological idea of the body as a closed system of energy, male sexual ‘expenditure’ and especially ‘excess’ (spermatorrhea) were said to cause enfeeblement. Thus it was seriously held, for example, that sexual appetite was incompatible with mental distinction and that procreation impaired artistic genius. Men were vigorously counselled to conserve vital health by avoiding fornication, masturbation and nocturnal emissions (for which a variety of devices were invented) and by rationing sex within marriage. Even when other causes were present, sickness and debility were frequently ascribed to masturbation – the great erotic subject described as vigorously as it was denounced. ‘That insanity arises from masturbation is now beyond a doubt’, declared one widely read authority, who also claimed that ‘masturbators’ became withdrawn, flabby, pale, self-mutilating and consumptive. Ailments afflicting adolescent girls were similarly said to signify abnormal sexual excitation. With punitive therapy in mind, some doctors erased sexual pleasure through barbaric practices such as penile cauterisation and clitorodectomy. ~ Sex & Sexuality in the 19th Century, Victoria and Albert Museum, London

VictorianLadies circa1855

But not only Christians who can be weighed down by moralistic guilt and shame, any person strongly influenced by a spiritual authority is vulnerable, particularly if that authority views sex outside of procreation a sin. (Part II up next)

Copyright © 2013 Dr. Nick Campos - All Rights Reserved.